Talk:WNSR

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tennessee Low‑importance

	Tennessee portal WNSR is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

comment

Man, I really don't get the chopping and blanking on this one. Who owns the station is a matter of public record, not speculation or opinion. The lawsuit in regard to ESPN affiliation is likewise such (who should win is POV, but the existence of it is definitely not). The station's broadcast power, daytime and nighttime, is also a matter of record. The only things on the page which could be deemed "opinion" are the effective signal radius (discussion of which the station seemingly brings on itself by advertising that it can be heard essentially all over the Midstate, which it can't) and whether the signal pattern has anything to do with protecting WHBQ (which is a class B station, so it seems relevant). This seems like a pretty lame topic for edit wars, IMO. Rlquall 20:33, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]