Talk:WMUR-TV
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Clarification?
[edit]The opening paragraph states: "It is the only network television station to exclusively cover the state of New Hampshire, as other networks are provided by out of state channels." I don't know what this is supposed to mean. Does "exclusively cover" mean that it covers only the state of New Hampshire, or that it is the only station that ever has exclusive coverage within New Hampshire? Does "other networks" mean networks other than ABC, and if so, what bearing does this have on exclusively covering New Hampshire? Better wording would help, or perhaps the deletion of this sentence if no one can fix it. GMcGath 14:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- It should go. It's too confusing -- and to explain why would confused me even more, so I won't even do that. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 14:29, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
I dunno, I'm new. Wikipedia is somehow improved by eliminating any reference to a network TV station monopolizing TV in New Hampshire, the state that picks the presidents? Aren't they protected from competition by the Federal Communication Commission? CitizenDaveS 01:17, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
I was going to post this improved and lightened up two paragraph item below. Constructive criticism please?---------------- CitizenDaveS 01:17, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
However, WMUR is now being accused by the Free Market News Network of bias for denying coverage of substantial antiwar candidates for president, specifically Ron Paul while providing detailed coverage of pro-Iraq war candidates for president, such as John McCain.
Since WMUR "is the only major network affiliate and local news source in the state" of New Hampshire, it provides a disproportionately high percentage of candidate information to the super-voters of New Hampshire. In 1988, then-Governor John H. Sununu said, "The people of Iowa pick corn, the people of New Hampshire pick presidents." It is argued that a lack of network competition plus the importance of the New Hampshire primaryin the selection of presidential candidates gives WMUR unmatched and unprecedented control over the American free election system.
NH TV Affiliates?
[edit]Should we remove the NH TV Affliates in the article? I think there are some of those information already in the respected articles. Steven312 00:31, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Only station to cover entire state?
[edit]The statement, "This distinguishes WMUR as being the only commercial television station in the country to completely cover an entire state," is clearly wrong. The Providence, RI commercial stations completely cover Rhode Island (by virtue of the state's small size). I am removing the statement from the article. Jimtrue 21:27, 22 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimtrue (talk • contribs) 21:25, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- The FCC site lookup shows the station as 6500 watts post-transition. Either this is a bad joke, or WMUR won't be serving "the entire state" for long. --99.245.244.176 (talk) 02:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
To cover the same area as their UHF (Channel 59) transmitter, their high-band VHF system uses significantly less power. Thus, the lower power requirement to provide A-grade coverage to the same area. BlargBlarg (talk) 02:37, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:WMUR.jpg
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:WMUR.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:58, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Wmur old logo.jpg
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Wmur old logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Tuesday's With Morrie Movie Fact
[edit]In the Film adaptation of Tuesday's With Morrie WMUR appears to be the main logo used in a fictional channel 9 in Detroit from all of the interviews that Mitch does. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.180.181.72 (talk) 22:59, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on WMUR-TV. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.hippopress.com/features/cover040304.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:43, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Failed purchase by Storer Broadcasting in 1957
[edit]Storer planned to purchase WMUR-TV in early 1957, but it came under fire when it announced plans to move its transmitter to just outside Haverhill, Massachusetts – only 20 miles north of Boston, with it soon becoming apparent that Storer intended to move all of channel 9's operations across the border to Massachusetts and reorient it as the Boston market's third VHF station but outcry from New Hampshire viewers led regulators to reject Storer's request to build a new tower near Haverhill, and Storer subsequently backed out of the deal. Had Storer's request been approved, it would have possibly made channel 9 a CBS affiliate due to its very good relations with that network (and given Boston VHF channels 2, 4, 5, 7, and 9), and it also would have potentially resulted in WNAC-TV (channel 7, the predecessor to the current WHDH) becoming a full-time ABC affiliate, and the original WHDH-TV (channel 5, now occupied by WCVB-TV) signing on as an independent station. 2601:587:100:6D8:79A0:4461:1C6F:1529 (talk) 01:59, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
It is also likely that WCVB-TV would have became a charter Fox owned-and-operated station when that network launched on October 9, 1986, and that Fox would not have purchased WXNE-TV (channel 25, now WFXT) from the Christian Broadcasting Network and contracted Boston radio station WMRE (1510 AM, now WMEX) to carry the audio portion of The Late Show Starring Joan Rivers in the interim until that sale closed. Channel 9 also would have possibly became an NBC affiliate (swapping affiliations with WBZ-TV [channel 4]) upon the Westinghouse-CBS affiliation deal in 1995. 2601:587:100:6D8:79A0:4461:1C6F:1529 (talk) 02:10, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
- B-Class United States articles
- High-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of High-importance
- B-Class New Hampshire articles
- High-importance New Hampshire articles
- WikiProject New Hampshire articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- B-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- B-Class Television stations articles
- Mid-importance Television stations articles
- Television stations task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles