Talk:WBNG-TV

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).

focus of the article

Do we really need to have all the anchors of each of the newscasts listed? This info is highly dynamic, and is not terribly relevant, IMHO. No disrespect intended to Candice, Greg, or Keri, et. al. Perhaps we *should* include the name of station staff, and the Wikipedia page history becomes the historical record. I would go along with it if we can expand the article to include more history:

What's I feel is more important (in an enclopedic entry) are the structural issues, ownership, demonstratable bias (like how advertisers affect news coverage, e.g., Time Warner cable contract story), the story about how locally produced content is dropped down to nothing, and what's there (e.g., "the news") is highly contrived. The SJL story, how jobs were cut in half, humans replaced by machines, local content replaced with satellite-based shows? These are just the facts. The capitalist ownership model of the media has cost Binghamton 42 jobs, in just 5 years and by the hands of just one capitalist: George Lilly! This fact should be reported.

What about the new owner, Granite? Bankrupt. Not simply worthless: if you hold it, it's costing you. Yikes! Drop it quick! The worth of the stock is just $3M, but they have $450 Million of debt. And Wall Street just gives them $70 more? WTF is going on here!!! That's not economics, that voodoo! Does Don Cornwell own a small island-nation(*) worth $500M that he's put up for collateral?

(* in fact, H.E. Stuart J Beck -- who sits on the board of Granite -- is Ambassador of a small island nation, Palau! I'm not making this up, people)

And the biggest story of all, (although not really just a WBNG thing) How the intellectual empoverishment and material deprivation of the people of Binghamton by capitalists like George Lily and Don Cornwell is exactly what we should expect, by the rules we've given to our economic system. This should be in the entry. These are demonstrable facts. Wall Street profits from Binghamton being ignorant, even programmed to buy certain products or vote for certain candidates. -- Bhuston 00:50, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wnbf12.jpg

Image:Wnbf12.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:10, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wbng90s.jpg

Image:Wbng90s.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wbngcirc12.jpg

Image:Wbngcirc12.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on WBNG-TV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:36, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]