Talk:Vishnu (disambiguation)
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Revert
[edit]@Gotitbro: An edit was reverted without stating proper reason or clarifiaction. I've reverted it. If you think your edit was correct, can I just know the clarification of the reason here?JaMongKut (talk) 13:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- @JaMongKut: The dab pages should at least have the dab name in the title of the article (your linked did not have that), especially on highly trafficked pages. Moreover you removed the primary topic and placed it below your linked article, a clear violation of dab and considering your edits on other articles bordering on WP:POVPUSH. Please don't do this. And I did explain my edit by citing MOS:DAB, please read edit summaries carefully. Gotitbro (talk) 14:10, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Gotitbro: since the discussion was going on, you should not revert the edits regarding it. By the way, according to WP you are liable for the reason as You've reverted. This is against guiidelines to change, because you don't like it and ask for the reason. By the way I'm giving some answers to your reason. See WP:NOPRIMARY, and for artivle with difeerent name, it is Natural Disambuguition. See the first line of Upulvan article nd read WP regarding to try naming article with different names if possible.JaMongKut (talk) 05:48, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- @JaMongKut: Read WP:BRD and WP:STATUSQUO. The onus is on you to satisfy other editors that your edits are valid especially when you disrupting WP:STABLE pages all over. Doesn't matter what the first line of Upulvan says its title doesn not contain Vishnu in it and its not going on a highly trafficked dab page. Moreover your edits here were clearly WP:POVPUSH, you removed Vishnu as the primary topic from dab and inserted Upulvan over it, a clear violation. You should familiarize yourself with how Wikipedia works before citing guidelines you have hardly read or even know how they are put into action. You've barely been here for sometime and have gotten into edit wars everywhere with multiple users. If you continue as such you are looking at an WP:ANI report and a likely ban, please desist. Gotitbro (talk) 06:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Gotitbro: since the discussion was going on, you should not revert the edits regarding it. By the way, according to WP you are liable for the reason as You've reverted. This is against guiidelines to change, because you don't like it and ask for the reason. By the way I'm giving some answers to your reason. See WP:NOPRIMARY, and for artivle with difeerent name, it is Natural Disambuguition. See the first line of Upulvan article nd read WP regarding to try naming article with different names if possible.JaMongKut (talk) 05:48, 15 February 2021 (UTC)