Jump to content

Talk:Vigilant Firehouse

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Close paraphrasing?

[edit]

Note that although there are about 5 sources, the bulk of this is based on two US Federal Government sources, the 1964 HABS document, and the 1970 NRHP nomination from the DC planning commission, which tends to repeat the earlier source. Given that these are Federal sources, there can be no copyright violation. Indeed the other sources tend to repeat these. I think I've done enough rewriting to avoid problems of plagiarism via "close paraphrasing" but it is tough when all the sources say the same thing. If anybody disagrees, they may rewrite some more, or contact me on my talk page. Smallbones (talk) 18:46, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vigilant Firehouse (Washington, D.C.). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]