This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
The page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion. I am starting this page because a Victim Rights Law Center does exist in Boston, MA and it is an organization that deserves a wikipedia page so that users can learn more about it. I have already provided the link to its website - it is a reputable non-profit. I am just starting to develop the page (thus, it is very barren, for now).
Stephanie
First, mere existence of an organization is not enough for a Wikipedia page. An organization must meet minimum notoriety requirementsbefore an article can be created about it, regardless of its mission. The kind of link you must provide to assert that this organization does meet our inclusion guidelines (that is, deserves a Wikipedia page, as you say) is the kind where the organization itself does not have a say in what goes in and what does not. In short, you must provide third-party references from reputable sources. As notability cannot be self-proclaimed, we are waiting for evidence that the organization is recognized as notable by people without a connection to it. -- Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 19:17, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well... I'm not connected to Victim Rights Law Center. I don't work there or anything. I have just heard about VRLC from people close to me. Am I "evidence that the organization is recognized as notable by people without a connection to it"?? I'm really lost. I tried looking through the pages about all of this and it is not making much sense..... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stedemkat (talk • contribs) 21:15, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The whole point here is that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and as such it should not be used to make a topic's existence known or to use as a directory. Google is better suited to fill that role than Wikipedia will ever be, and there are scores of free web hosts you might want to use. As a non-profit organization, you might even be able to get one, ad-free, from the government of your state. But Wikipedia's aim is to be a reference for topics that have already achieved a certain level of notoriety, not to boost the notoriety of those that haven't.
As for your references, they only mention the Law Center in passing, and so do not qualify as "significant coverage." -- Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 00:45, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This organization is notable perhaps mostly for advocating reform of laws dealing with victims of sexual assault. I've added numerous references to the article and believe that they constitute significant coverage. GobonoboTC02:56, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]