Talk:Veterans Affairs Canada

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Governments of Canada.

Military history: Canadian / North America C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Canadian military history task force
	North American military history task force

Headquarters Location

Are they really located on PEI? Can somebody explain this? Mikedelsol 09:59, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Veterans Affairs Canada head office was relocated from Ottawa to Charlottetown between 1976, when the annoucement was first made, to 1984, when the move was considered "complete".

As to why, keep an eye on this page, I'll be adding to it soon. Wikig39 17:45, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Vet affairs canada.jpg

Image:Vet affairs canada.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:06, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Poppy.gif

Image:Poppy.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 12:41, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:VeteranVoice.info Title.gif Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:VeteranVoice.info Title.gif, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:VeteranVoice.info Title.gif)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:31, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Numerous Political Attack Links

I have deleted a number of links to a disreputed organization that claims to be "advocating" for veterans. These links had nothing to do with Veterans Affairs Canada and were aimed at politically damaging and/or insulting the Veterans Affairs Minister and the Conservative government. Advertising for this one-man advocacy group should not be done under the guise of an encyclopaedia about Veterans Affairs Canada. Gentek16 (talk) 02:17, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Additions from Canadian Veterans Advocacy

It is obvious that a member or supporter of the Canadian Veterans Advocacy is using this page as their personal kingdom to slander the department, the minister, and the government. This is not acceptable. I have removed or corrected their additions. Gentek16 (talk) 02:53, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged incomplete

This article comes off as an anti-government attack article; all it did was criticize the government/the department for what it didn't do, and it used questionable sources (or none at all). I've done a cleanup of the biased stuff. What we need now is an expansion of this article into all the good it does (especially the implementation of the New Veterans Charter). Gentek16 (talk) 02:48, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Veterans Affairs Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20141014091911/http://www.veterans.gc.ca/eng/news/just-the-facts/info-graphics/injured-veterans-grade-3 to http://www.veterans.gc.ca/eng/news/just-the-facts/info-graphics/injured-veterans-grade-3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:31, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]