Jump to content

Talk:Vermont Route 17

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleVermont Route 17 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 16, 2008Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)

This is a nice piece of work, but it still has some shortcomings with respect to the good article criteria.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): - Updated:  — master sonT - C 19:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)) b (MoS): - Updated:  — master sonT - C 19:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • distance in 2nd para of History needs to have a convert. Done
  • "The road was paved between 1936 and 1940" - so the pavement was removed after 1940? Please clear up  Done
  • Lets use {{jct}} in the infobox to keep consistency with the junction list  Done
  • Bold in the history section?  Done
Works for me - I'll note that for future reviews.  — master sonT - C 23:51, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The route description does not detail anything about the NY 910L portion. Since this article focuses partly on it - perhaps there should be some detail in there. Done
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  4. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Can we get a map of the route? (not binding to the review)  Done
  6. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: - Updated:  — master sonT - C 19:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Overall its very good, just these few fixes and we're ready to go, holding until then

 — master sonT - C 19:09, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Updated - passed congratulations  — master sonT - C 19:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]