Talk:Vehicle insurance in the United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mexican insurance

Should Mexican Insurance REALLY be included on a list of related topics? I question whether it's all that related. If Mexican insurance is included, there should be an article on international car insurance as a whole, rather than a very specific topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.25.81.204 (talk) 01:56, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-compulsory states section

Hi, I think there is definitely something wrong with the table for non-compulsory states. Maybe there is a { missing somewhere, because I don't think it's displaying correctly. Unfortunately I don't know how to fix it. Rschwieb (talk) 22:23, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"See the table on the right"

Doesn't much assist the layman. Here's the text of the explanatory table:

Understanding the tables: XX/XX/XX = Bodily Injury Limit (per individual)/Bodily Injury Limit (total)/Property Damage Limit For example, limits of 25/50/20 means after "an accident each person injured would receive a maximum of up to 25,000 with only 50,000 allowed per accident (ex. 2 people needing 25,000, if the need is more such as 3 people needing 25,000 then whoever files first gets first access to the 50,000 limit and you may be sued for the rest if the accident was your fault). The last number refers to the total coverage per accident for property damage which in this case would be 20,000."

Gibberish. Can someone parse this into intelligible English (I can't)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.212.151.224 (talk) 14:03, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Arguments Against (added): The mandates to buy auto insurance exceeds the authority given state legislative governments by their own Constitutions over the free will and freedoms of the American people. Many feel driving is a risk, and if you wish to insure your own property against that risk, it should be a choice not a mandate. Free markets mean the choice to buy auto insurance should be there, but remain a choice with the courts and legislature using then mandatory insurance depending on the age of the driver (in the case of minors), driving history (in the case of proven loss or injury to another driver), or for foreign citizens visiting or living in the state.Lindaggj (talk) 14:25, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Harmonie Law Compendium

For state-specific differences, it's worthwhile to check out Harmonie's Auto Law Compendium. II | (t - c) 06:36, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

California

California offers Low Cost Automobile Program (CLCA) to insure poor drivers.^[1] Benjamin (talk) 11:05, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://www.insurance.ca.gov/01-consumers/105-type/95-guides/01-auto/lca/

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:39, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.insurance.ca.gov/01-consumers/105-type/95-guides/01-auto/lca/

[1]