Talk:Unicorns (cricket team)

A fact from Unicorns (cricket team) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 May 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Unicorns, an unpaid English cricket team made up of out-of-contract professionals and aspiring youngsters, was created to take part in the 2010 Clydesdale Bank 40 competition?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/May.

Wikipedia

‹ The template below (WikiProject Cricket) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›

Cricket Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Cricket To-do list:

Article assessment

Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details

Verifiability

Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards

Cleanup

There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)

Infoboxes

Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes

Cricket people

Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players
Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list
Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class.
Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket.
Create articles for redlinks present here and here

Cricket teams & countries

Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe;
Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams
Create articles about cricket in these missing countries
Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles
Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI

Images

Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people
Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here

On this day in cricket

Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries

Umpires

Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel

Women

Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours

Update

A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains
Regularly updating cricketers' career stats.

Other

Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:47, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unicorns cricket team → Unicorns (cricket team) — "cricket team" is not part of the team's name. They are simply known as "Unicorns". However, since moving this article to Unicorns would be inappropriate, adding "cricket team" in parentheses as a disambiguator seems to be the only logical solution. – Pee Jay 20:24, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure. I thought the way I did it was sort of WP:CRIC consensus (for other countries at least - I've checked the SA teams (e.g.Western Province and Boland) and just assumed that that was the format, rather that the use of the actual team name. Maybe wrong though. I've posted it at WT:CRIC to get some more eyes.—MDCollins (talk) 00:12, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support in fact. Other domestic teams are set at their 'brand name' Otago Volts, New South Wales Blues, rather than Otago cricket team. As Unicorn already exits (or does it?! :) ) Unicorns (cricket team) seems suitable for me. SGGH ^ping! 23:48, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Article queries arising from multiple sources

I've got a couple of queries (commented out in the article)

Concerns the squad. The Cricinfo squad page has 21 players (including Greenidge and Burton who have withdrawn) which are presumably the 21 originally registered/declared for the competition. However, Jonathan Miles played in both warm-up games (had the two previously withdrawn by this point?) and so is he legitimately in the squad? For a squad of 21 to feature somebody else is a little strange.
The formation of the Clydesdale Bank competition. Ireland declined to compete, thus leaving a space. I assumed that Unicorns was created to fill that gap, but one source says that the Netherlands took Ireland's place. If so, can anyone find a reference regarding the initial mandate for the competition or it's proposed format that includes the ECB Recreational XI (which became Unicorns)?
Is there an official website that hasn't been found by Google yet?!!

Thanks guys, —MDCollins (talk) 00:12, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

for 3. I couldn't find one for either the team or the competition. SGGH ^ping! 00:47, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3. Just found the official logo (presumably) here - fair use? Official competition website?—MDCollins (talk) 00:53, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For 2, here are two articles from my CricketEurope colleague Rod Lyall - firstly, one indicating that "The Netherlands would be squeezed out by Ireland, Scotland and a side comprising club cricketers from England and Wales." [1] and another headlined "Irish withdrawal gives Dutch their Pro40 chance". [2] Andrew nixon (talk) 06:12, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The incorrect claim that the Unicorns replaced Ireland is still in the article (the Dutch replaced Ireland). I'd remove it myself but am off to work now. Andrew nixon (talk) 06:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Done it.—User:MDCollins (talk) 10:34, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. I'm hoping to be going to the Lancashire v Unicorns match at Old Trafford in July, so I'll try and get a couple of photos. Andrew nixon (talk) 11:27, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add in a few more pictures over the next few days/weeks from the Somerset match, definitely got one of Querl, and some not great ones of O'Shea and Thompson too.. Harrias ^talk 11:36, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:1, CI still hasn't updated the squad lists; I wonder who the other extra member was (alongside Miles) who replaced Greenidge and Burton...—User:MDCollins (talk) 10:34, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Squad List

I think we could be running into a problem with the squad list. It appears that (recently anyway), Unicorns have been calling up players as necessary for latter matches, obviously some are being released/signed up - the squad list is quite difficult to maintain now. There are no real sources as to who has replaced whom, Ed Young was obviously called up for a couple of games, then signed for Gloucestershire and played in the CB40 a week later. Not sure what to propose - soon the initial squad will be irrelevant anyway. It may depend on what happens next year. If the team continues, a split into season articles would be more appropriate, and would allow stats in the squad tables - how many games/runs etc. Therefore the 2010 season article could note the initial 21, (plus the 2 that quit) and then have an "others section", or just merge them all together.

Thoughts please,

—User:MDCollins (talk) 10:12, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think if the team continues next year (which is probably going to happen considering their successes this year, and the amount of the players that have been picked up – I personally would prefer the best team from the Minor Counties be promoted to play in the competition, but never mind!) then splitting the article into seasons would be the most logical, with an overall page describing the point of the team, history, and probably that season's squad? Not sure if that tallies up with your idea? Harrias ^talk 11:30, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty much yeah. Let's keep an eye on the squad for the remainder of this season - then see about splitting it after that. As it stands, we only have 20 players I believe now Young has come and gone - so a new one may be added before long. I had a feeling that Durston was still going to be available but that may have changed now. Are there any from the original 21 that haven't played but still get overlooked?—User:MDCollins (talk) 11:48, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Durston initially just signed with Derbys for the Twenty20, but following his good performances, he moved completely, making him available for Derbyshire in all three formats, thus not able to play for Unicorns. As I understand it anyway! Harrias ^talk 12:10, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]