Jump to content

Talk:Under the Pyramids/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 14:26, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:27, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    I made a number of minor copy-edits. Prose good, structure fine, lead summarises the article adequately.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Article is well referenced, sources are RS, no evidence of OR. I assume good faith for off line sources.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Covers the subject in sufficient detail, without unnecessary trivia
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Two images used with suitable rationales and captions
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    I can't find fault with this, so am happy to list it. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 14:45, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, great! Thanks so much for the review! Canadian Paul 01:46, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]