Talk:USS LST-353

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Internal explosion?

It strains credulity that an "internal explosion" in this one ship would also destroy 4 other ships. Was it crammed full of TNT? Why is there no article on the "West Loch" explosion? Edison (talk) 04:54, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another triumph of planning at Pearl. [1]. Gasoline or a dropped mortar shell started the explosion which took out several closely spaces ships. Nimitz saw no reason to make adjustments in the future in how closely ships loaded with fuel and explosives were docked since it was a "calculated risk." Edison (talk) 05:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wreckage still visible today.

The remnants of LST-353 are still visible today. See Google Earth 21 21'25.90"N 157 59'49.71"W 121.216.97.224 (talk) 11:47, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]