Talk:USS Boston (1825)

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Ships Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Updated info

DANFS updated the entry for this ship [1] about two years after this article was first created. --Brad (talk) 01:30, 1 February 2008 (UTC) The article "The Paulet Affair1843" about a temporary takeover of Hawaii cites the USS Boston as the American ship that stood by impotently while Lord George Paulet took over the islands for five month. It links to this article, which does not cite a USS Boston as having been in the Pacific during the 1840s.Was there an intervening USS Boston after the 1825 Boston was wrecked? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.26.9.191 (talk) 13:44, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]