Talk:U.S. Route 78 in Arkansas

U.S. Roads: U.S. Highways / Arkansas Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Types
	U.S. Routes
	Locations
	Arkansas
	Notes and alerts
	This article does not have a KML file. Please work with the Maps department to create and add a file for this article.
	This article does not have a map. Please work with the Maps department to create and add a file for this article.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

United States: Arkansas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arkansas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arkansas (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Routing

US 78 in Arkansas is literally signed do as east-west in the entire length of the state despite of going from northwest to southeast like it does in U.S. Route 78 in South Carolina article. There are photos of the signage, especially at us ends website even in Google maps street view. There are more things need to be fix and improved in the article. Reverting isn’t the solution. @Imzadi1979 2600:1005:B0F0:1A7A:314F:8768:2AF:32EE (talk) 21:49, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear IP editor: I don't know why you pinged me nor apparently made the comment that you did about me. I have not reverted anything in this article. I did apply some formatting fixes and copy edits to improve the text that is here.

There's a whole RD subsection that needs to be added. There are missing rows in the exit list table. We should provide content here related the I-55 concurrency. The article on U.S. Route 31 in Michigan doesn't tell readers to to read the Interstate 196 even though the two designations overlap. Neither U.S. Route 41 in Michigan nor M-28 (Michigan highway) tells our readers to go to the other article for content about that lengthy concurrency.

The lead should get a little more text added. One good full paragraph that summarizes the route description and the history would be great. With that and the missing content, this article would be in pretty good shape. Imzadi 1979 → 01:27, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]