Talk:Two-level scheduling

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Regarding the "Linux" section: It may be that there should be a notation as to why a modern OS does not use this concept, but without that notation, simply noting the fact that a particular modern OS does not use this concept is pointless. If someone wishes to make an edit which explains why a modern OS (perhaps using generic terms) would choose not to do this, that's one thing. Simply saying "This particular OS doesnt use this" and not giving any reason.. well I could take all day to do some research and list a bunch of OSs which don't use this method, it still wouldnt be relevent to the article. This scheduling method also isn't employed by army ants, should we link to army ants as well? Vstarre 15:02, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]