Talk:Turning Point (2005 wrestling)
Turning Point (2005 wrestling) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 27, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Turning Point (2005 wrestling) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Turning Point (2005 wrestling) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 February 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Turning Point (2005 wrestling)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 00:13, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: WillC
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 00:13, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
- a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
Done
Check for WP:LAYOUT: Done
|
Done
Check for WP:WTW: Done
Check for WP:MOSFICT: Done
|
Done
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
- a. Has an appropriate reference section: Yes
- b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: excellent (Thorough check on Google.)
Done
Check for inline citations WP:MINREF: Done
|
- c. No original research: Done
Done
|
3: Broad in its coverage
b. Focused:
|
---|
Done
|
4: Neutral
Done
4. Fair representation without bias: Done
|
5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (NFC with a valid FUR) (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license) (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license) (PD)
Images:
|
---|
Done
6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: Done
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: Done
|
As per the above checklist, there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA. The prose quality in particular has been fantastic in all your articles. Thanks, Will, very much for your diligence in writing such great articles.
Promoting the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 22:00, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Sports and recreation good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class Professional wrestling articles
- Low-importance Professional wrestling articles
- WikiProject Professional wrestling articles
- GA-Class Florida articles
- Low-importance Florida articles
- WikiProject Florida articles