Jump to content

Talk:Transdev Blazefield

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments

[edit]

Head office Harrogate according to subsidiary article so added to WP Yorkshire

Needs info box - --BulldozerD11 (talk) 02:41, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

This article has a lot of red links scattered everywhere, could do with a tidy up DG6985 (talk) 23:46, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

[edit]

I have proposed that Yorkshire Coastliner be merged here.--Charles (talk) 22:41, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No Need for it to move has sufficient information AskhamBogs (talk) 19:19, 14 February 2013 (UTC) Blocked for sockpuppetry. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:41, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seems appropriate with what has happened with transdev York. Tom the Tomato (talk) 21:52, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]

Have found an article about Blazefield that might be useful: "Blazefield: Going for growth". busandcoach.com. Plum Publishing Ltd. 13 February 2007.. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:26, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Split proposal

[edit]

Earlier in 2013 it was agreed that Transdev York and Yorkshire Coastliner would be merged into the Transdev Blazefield page. Based on the size of the articles, a fair decision.

Transdev Blazefield is a subsidiary of Transdev and has six distinct bus companies operating under it. Currently four, Burnley & Pendle, Harrogate & District, Keighley & District, Lancashire United, have their own pages while Transdev York and Yorkshire Coastliner are included on this page.

In the interests of consistency, I believe all six subsidiaries need to be combined on this page, or have an individual page? Given the size of the four that are stand alone, I am leaning toward the latter.Mo7838 (talk) 20:02, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:BRANCH they should all be merged here and I am planning to do so when I get time. None of them are very big especially once the cruft is trimmed out.--Charles (talk) 20:42, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They are supposed to be each a sperate page as information on them was deleted without reason as for Transdev York it had information about them and the routes and other parts like Unibus, and Coastliner shouldn't of been mereged her as all you need is links to each pages not on in one. Jbicky00 (talk) 20:02, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Transdev Blazefield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:48, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]