Talk:Tom Stevenson

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tom Stevenson article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Food and drink: Wine C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

C

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is within the scope of Wines task force, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

WikiProject Wine open tasks:

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Wine:

Article request: Sebastiani family, Great Wine Capitals of the World.

Expand: any of the ~700 wine stubs, particularly the region and "miscellaneous" ones, Western Australian wine

Improve: Canadian wine, Greek wine, Vitis vinifera, wine serving temperature, Western Australian wine, other Start class articles

Articles to GA: Wine, Australian wine, Bordeaux wine, Burgundy wine, California wine, Champagne (wine), Chianti, Dessert wine, French wine, German wine, Grenache, Italian wine, Merlot, Pinot gris, Pinot noir, Rioja (wine), Spanish wine, Sparkling wine, Syrah, Tempranillo, Winemaking

Articles to FA: Cabernet Sauvignon, Riesling, Sauvignon blanc

Cleanup: Cleanup lists of wine-related articles: all articles and articles by category.

Unreferenced biographies of living persons

Copyedit: Aligoté, Cabernet franc, Malbec, Robert M. Parker, Jr., Pinot blanc, Rioja (wine)

Photo request: Just about all of them! Any pictures of wine regions, grape varieties or wine would be useful. In particular we need wine region maps that can be licensed for Wikipedia.

Collaboration: Operation stub-killer, Nominations for top level importance

Infobox: Template:Infobox grape variety, Template:Infobox winery

Other: Comment on the grape article template and on the grape infobox. Add to the Wikiquote page for wine: Wikiquote wine

view • edit • discuss • history • watch

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was No consensus for move: 4v2 is not an overwhelming majority, and no particularly strong arguments nor supporting evidence have been provided for this article's claim to primacy. Parsecboy (talk) 01:22, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Or rather, requested undo of previous undiscussed move. I don't see that moving this article to "Tom Stevenson (author)", in order to make "Tom Stevenson" a redirect to "Thomas Stevenson (disambiguation)" is warranted or necessary. Here is an article with a precise name, and a clear primary topic with unique namespace, and it is made a redirect as an abbreviation of another name? It makes no sense to me, and this is a case where a hatnotes would suffice. MURGH ^disc. 12:12, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support request to return the redirect back to the Primary topic. 04:26, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Support. There's no other article using the name "Tom Stevenson" so qualifier is unnecessary. A hatnote to "Thomas Stevenson" is appropriate. Station1 (talk) 06:39, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - incoming links all appear to be to him, no ambiguity, no need for disambiguation, and dab page will sort out links for other people with similar names (and the same applies to Thomas Stevenson (designer), who has been similarly moved to inappropriate name from primary usage). PamD (talk) 08:46, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. If there's a primary topic, it's the lighthouse designer. See also Talk:Thomas Stevenson (designer)#Requested move. Andrewa (talk) 22:53, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comm: Is his legal name "Tom"? MURGH ^disc. 22:58, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For the name "Tom Stevenson"? The wine writer is the clear primary. Look at the regular google hits for Tom Stevenson and the nearly 23,000 hits for the Tom Stevenson plus wine compared to the minuscule 346 hits for "Tom Stevenson lighthouse". Even "Thomas Stevenson lighthouse" only pulls up a little over 9000 hits. There is no contest here. Agne ^Cheese/^Wine 23:00, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whether or not his "legal" name is Tom, this wine writer appears to be the primary usage for "Tom Stevenson", and the lighthouse engineer is the primary usage for "Thomas". Neither of them appears to be known by the other version of the name. It makes sense to have these two as primary usages, and have a single dab page, linked from these two, to connect all the other Tom/Thomas Stevensons. PamD (talk) 23:05, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree with your interpretation of those Google figures. What you've established is that there is an ambiguity, as the lighthouse designer does get some hits as Tom, and that there are far more websites discussing wine than discussing lighthouses. Andrewa (talk) 23:55, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An overwhelming testament of Google hits shows that there is no ambiguity. While there is a few straggling mentions of "Tom" in relation to the lighthouse designer, the overwhelming and primary usage of Tom Stevenson is clearly the wine writer. Just because there are few straggling reference to Paris, Texas as "Paris" doesn't mean that there is any ambiguity about what the primary usage of Paris is. Agne ^Cheese/^Wine 00:00, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. There are many things that can skew the Google results, so simple counts of Google hits are no case at all. They're useful in indicating where to look for better evidence, but that's about all.

We need to ask what the reason is for this imbalance. It might be, as you suggest, that nearly everyone who uses the name Tom Stevenson does mean this author. Or it might just mean that there are more webpages concerning wine than lighthouses, and there are. Or looking deeper, it might mean that this Tom Stevenson is mainly of contemporary interest in areas with lots of web users, while the other Thomas Stevenson is of historical interest, and therefore of interest worldwide and in the longer term, and he is. Lots of things to consider.

It's not all that important. The most important thing is to have a combined disambig page, so everyone can get to the article they want in a reasonable number of mouse clicks. Andrewa (talk) 01:05, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Let the plain name be the disambig page. Currently Thomas Stevenson (disambiguation) lists 4 people and Thomas Stephenson lists 2 people. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

You know what is odd....the original no-consensus move that took place a few days ago would have obviously failed. Yet for some reason you now need a "super majority" to correct it? Where is that in Wikipedia policy. I actually think WP:BRD should be applicable. The original bold page move should be reverted as there is a clear lack of consensus for that. Agne ^Cheese/^Wine 03:33, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. There is no evidence for anyone else being called "Tom", and the move should clearly have been reverted. PamD (talk) 08:21, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adulation

The whole entry sounds more like an eulogy to Tom Stevenson than a matter-of-fact style encyclopedia entry. Having read books by him myself I do not doubt his expertise. But statements like "In this book, Stevenson has shown that he has the gift of taking vast quantities of knowledge and experience and translating them into lucid, sparkling prose, easily graspable by the novice, yet still interesting and instructive to the connoisseur." are in my opinion not fit for encyclopedias. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.87.19.25 (talk) 12:59, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removed unsourced information

[he has published 23 books], the most important of which have been published internationally by more than 50 publishers and translated into over 25 languages

Although Stevenson's first writings on wine were published in Decanter in the late 1970s, a magazine for which he still writes, he was a more prolific contributor to WINE Magazine for consumers and Wine & Spirit International for the trade (both since merged into Wine & Spirit) during the 1980s and 1990s. At the time he was known for his monthly "Fizz File" column in WINE Magazine, and for being the author of the award winning annual Champagne supplements for both of these magazines.

Wine Report was the recipient of "Best in World" prizes three times at the Gourmand International Awards, and in 2006 it became the only wine book to be inducted into Gourmand's Hall of Fame (a feat unmatched by other wine books until 2007 when joined by The World Atlas of Wine and Bordeaux et ses Vins).

Stevenson has been chairman of Champagne and Alsace panels at the "Decanter World Wine Awards" since its inception, and has judged at other major competitions in France, Germany, Greece, Australia and the U.S.

Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 00:15, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Citogenesis Warning

It appears sources are reporting that Tom has won "Wine Writer of the Year" three times, when the RS I can track down only says he was nominated three times. Information was added by someone with an apparent COI, and sources produced since report the won three times claim. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 00:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Links to add/integrate

Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 06:43, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]