Talk:Tlemcen

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tlemcen article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Africa: Algeria

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Algeria portal This article is supported by WikiProject Algeria.

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The location is 48,[1] in this is 13 [2] in page don't is this.Jurema Oliveira (talk) 14:50, 12 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]

More info about Tlemcen

and slightly different content are available in the French and Spanish versions of this article on Wikepedia 24.4.64.25 (talk) 02:50, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tlemcen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121106085222/http://www.geohive.com/cntry/algeria.aspx?levels=Tlemcen to http://www.geohive.com/cntry/algeria.aspx?levels=Tlemcen

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:28, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

History

The last line of Etymology (about it being founded by Maghreb and being an ancient capital of the Maghreb people) has some disagreement with the first lines of the next section and lacks sourcing. Also sounds rather nationalistic without sourcing and unlikely considering their were other important Berber cities that we have better proof of that are older. 216.154.62.174 (talk) 12:57, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article tone/style issues

I've fixed some of the apparent peacock terms and tone problems which I assume brought about the maintenance tag added in June 2021 ([3]). From a quick look, there may still be some language that needs improving in the lead section and in the "culture" section. In short, adding more reliably-sourced info and removing vague praises would solve any remaining issues. I've focused on some of the history section, so I leave the rest to those more familiar with the rest of the topic. R Prazeres (talk) 23:29, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]