Talk:Timber Creek, Northern Territory

A fact from Timber Creek, Northern Territory appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 May 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Gregory's tree (pictured), near Timber Creek in Australia's Northern Territory, bears inscriptions by 19th-century explorers and is registered as both a heritage place and an Aboriginal sacred site?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Timber Creek, Northern Territory.

Wikipedia

Australia: Places / Northern Territory Low‑importance

	Australia portal Timber Creek, Northern Territory is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian places (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Northern Territory (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the Northern Territory Library.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

DYK nomination

I've nominated this article to be featured in the "Did you know" feature on the main page. The nomination is below. --Orlady (talk) 15:37, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Subheadings

I thank Leptus Froggi for your recent edits, however I argue that the removal of the subheadings makes the article more confusing to read and navigate, for example the climate information now falls under the subheading "Griffiths Decision", and although it is a separate paragraph, this relates to completely different subject matter. I would like a consensus on reverting the edit, as when I originally created this article, I based the subheading structure on consistency with other articles about small towns in the Northern Territory (see Adelaide River, Northern Territory). Furthermore the article was peer reviewed as B class and edited several times for formatting and consistency when featured as a DYK, however I would like to know what other Wikipedians think about this. Dfadden (talk) 07:51, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Dfadden that the removal of some headings diminished the quality of the article. I've restored some headings so that the table of contents once again allows readers to navigate the article topics. It would be worthwhile to discuss the article organization -- including whether these headings are the right ones, but dislike for certain headings is not a good reason to put clearly unrelated topics together under one of the remaining headings. --Orlady (talk) 12:16, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]