Talk:The Prince and the Dressmaker
Appearance
![]() | The Prince and the Dressmaker has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 15, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from The Prince and the Dressmaker appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 February 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
GA review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Prince and the Dressmaker/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 05:15, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Starts Good Article Review Page. Hopefully we will start the review shortly. Thank you --Whiteguru (talk) 05:15, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Observations
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- Consider if we need a link to Film rights in in the lead ...
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- Reference 1 loops with a network protocol error. Might another date be accessed?
- References 5 and 6 are both particularly positive for genderfluid young adults. Well sourced.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- Plot is handled well.
- This is an emergent genre and the fairy tale ending attracts both criticism and praise. Well handled in this article and in the references. There is a sense that this could end up being a benchmark novel for young adults and their gender dysphoria.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- NPOV is presented in this article.
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Page created 14 January 2020
- 1,334 page views in the last 30 days
- 3,785 page views in the last 90 days with a daily average of 43 views;
- Page has 52 edits by 8 editors;
- 10 Category edits: ok
- 41 links to page; 19 external links
- Page history shows no reverts nor edit-warring; page is considered stable;
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- File:The Prince and the Dressmaker cover.jpg = (Book cover) ~ illustrates an article discussing the book in question; fair use is accepted.
- File:Jen Wang at BookExpo (05369).jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
- Overall:
- Thanks Whiteguru! I've made suggested changes as best I can. The Forbes archive link still proves troublesome but I've swapped it around with the regular URL so that should be the one most folks click on if they click through to that ref. Thanks for your review and do check this book out if you haven't—I've read it a few times and cried each and every one. —Collint c 14:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Language and literature good articles
- GA-Class Book articles
- WikiProject Books articles
- GA-Class Comics articles
- Low-importance Comics articles
- GA-Class Comics articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Comics articles
- GA-Class children and young adult literature articles
- Low-importance children and young adult literature articles
- GA-Class LGBT articles
- WikiProject LGBT studies articles
- GA-Class Women writers articles
- Mid-importance Women writers articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- WikiProject Women writers articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles