Talk:The Great Debasement

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Great Debasement article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Numismatics: British currency Low‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British currency task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Monarch?

Queen Elizabeth was not monarch in 1451? -Strategist1 (talk) 04:43, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SOURCE The whole article seems to be copied verbatim from Larry Allen: The Encyclopedia of Money. 2009 (Entry: "The Great Debasement, p. 189-90".Tischbein123 (talk) 14:21, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Date wrong

"dropped numerous times from the previously fine silver (92.5%) to 50% in 1549 and again to 33% in 1546." 1546 was BEFORE 1549. Either the date or the adverb is wrong. Jamesdowallen (talk) 11:56, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

'The' in title

Is 'the' somehow an integral part of this term? If not, per MOS:AT the article should be moved to Great Debasement. 1.47.15.250 (talk) 09:54, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]