This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Following suit with Dick Durbin and Bernie Sanders, these outdated official portraits from nearly a decade ago should be replaced with recent images. Here's some potential replacements and let's vote as to whether we should change the image. I personally prefer C. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 02:33, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Option A (current; 2013)
Option B (2017)
Option C (2019)
Option D (2019)
Option E (2023)
Option F (2023)
Comment: It's been three years and another better image option (more recent; looks professional has popped up). Look at Cory Booker, Bernie Sanders, Beto O'Rourke, Jim Risch, Tulsi Gabbard and Mike Crapo. Their infoboxes aren't using outdated official portraits, they're using more recent/good quality/candid pics instead. The main rationale is either it's too outdated or the subject no longer looks similar today than they were when the lead pic was taken. Compare Baldwin's 2013 portrait (outdated) to the 2023 candid pic and you can tell she looks different. The main rationale is why Trump's portrait isn't being used in the 2024 election article too. This is about consistency. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 05:01, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
Option A (current; 2013)
Option B (2017)
Option C (2019)
Option D (2019)
Option E (2023)
Option F (2023)
.jpg)
_(48128826438)_(cropped).jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
Comment: It's been three years and another better image option (more recent; looks professional has popped up). Look at Cory Booker, Bernie Sanders, Beto O'Rourke, Jim Risch, Tulsi Gabbard and Mike Crapo. Their infoboxes aren't using outdated official portraits, they're using more recent/good quality/candid pics instead. The main rationale is either it's too outdated or the subject no longer looks similar today than they were when the lead pic was taken. Compare Baldwin's 2013 portrait (outdated) to the 2023 candid pic and you can tell she looks different. The main rationale is why Trump's portrait isn't being used in the 2024 election article too. This is about consistency. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 05:01, 21 August 2024 (UTC)