Talk:TOPCAT (software)

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

userfy, 2019-11-02, see DRV.
delete, 2019-05-27, see discussion.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the TOPCAT (software) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Astronomy Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Pathway back to mainspace

Following userfication and kludging in a couple of references I may return to the article and refactor and rework it from having suffered from some hurried work done previously at WP:AFD. I may work on it tomorrow, next week, next month, or even not at all. After thats been done I'll review where its at and make a judgement what to do next. It it looks structurally fair I may interim it to draft. I won't return it to mainspace unless I feel its sufficiently in order from it and standing a strong chance of surviving WP:AFD if it cam to that. I of course welcome positive contributions from others, please also dive in. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 18:22, 5 November 2019 (UTC) To be clear, anyones welcome to dive in (Perhaps unless I'm doing a major work). If several might then also feel free to move to draftspace. thanks. Djm-leighpark (talk) 23:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've refactored a bit as there were too many one line paragraphs. At this point I've decided to move it to draft it case anyone wishes to positively enhance it. It probally needs a bit about correllation. I also think I know where I can source an image without loading the thing up. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 20:17, 20 November 2019 (UTC) Pössel & Rousseau/Érard new sources respect the closer and the article is better refactored so bolding live.Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:01, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CC4.0w source

I note source (Rousseau, Érard, 2019) has a CC Attribution 4.0 license which if I am not mistaken allows re-use if attributed (Double check this peoples and also check out how to make use of it).Djm-leighpark (talk) 23:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]