Talk:TM103 Hustlerz Ambition

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 8 May 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from TM103: Hustlerz Ambition to TM103 Hustlerz Ambition. The result of the discussion was moved.

Edit request from Amoney17, 24 June 2011

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Amoney17 (talk) 05:23, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed.- Happysailor ^(Talk) 08:08, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from 205.223.222.34, 20 September 2011

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

205.223.222.34 (talk) 18:29, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

no request made--Jac16888 ^Talk 18:47, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Track listing change again?

Ok guys, tell me what's up with the current change...the previous one was based off of http://twitter.com/#!/OfficialTM103/status/113151928032165888, has that been revoked?--Papa G (talk) 23:34, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Official Guest Confirmation?

According to the track listing source (as well as others), not all the guest have been confirmed for the album--Supergamer345 (talk) 18:33, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agreee, the featured guests should be removed until a reliable source is listed.201.123.16.97 (talk) 02:47, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ya i agree, this needs to be done.P0PP4B34R732 (talk) 03:08, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 18:29, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thug Motivation 103: Hustlerz Ambition → TM103: Hustlerz Ambition – Per the album cover. --Relisted. jcc (tea and biscuits) 20:00, 10 July 2013 (UTC) Koala15 (talk) 19:09, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Per album cover, iTunes, and Amazon. STATic message me! 20:09, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the cover says "TM:103" or TM:103 : Hustlerz Ambition/TM:103 — Hustlerz Ambition -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 03:18, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 8 May 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 05:18, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TM103: Hustlerz Ambition → TM103 Hustlerz Ambition – I feel that the incorrect location of the colon at the end of the title is more incorrect than the omission of the colon, but others may feel differently. I see there is a former RM above this that addressed the full title name but the colon placement was maintained following the move, and I feel it is more incorrect than the aforementioned alternative. microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 18:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Young Jeezy’s other album, TM104: The Legend of the Snowman, follows a similar pattern, so I believe the current title should work fine for this album too. – DreamRimmer (talk) 19:13, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that's a valid argument to follow a different album title as the published works use different titles:

TM104: The Legend of the Snowman listed as such on Spotify, YouTube, Discogs
TM:103 Hustlerz Ambition on Spotify, YouTube, Discogs

microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 19:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See this Billboard article. – DreamRimmer (talk) 19:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the Billboard source, the colon used in the title suggests a compound title "‘TM103’: Track-By-Track Review, (emphasis mine), in the track listings, they support the original colon style Jeezy opens “TM:103” by stating the obvious to the blocks and blogs, they’ve been “waiting on 103.” with the colon in the middle. The only instance I see in that article of the colon after the 103 is when the full name is specified Which songs on Young Jeezy’s “Thug Motivation 103: Hustlerz Ambition” are among his best work? Here’s our Twitter-length track-by-track review. microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 19:59, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have no strong opinion on this. Just added my comment based on what I’ve seen. – DreamRimmer (talk) 02:38, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We could use other characters that looks like a colon, such as ∶. Ca ^{talk to me!} 07:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would support a move instead to TM;103 Hustlerz Ambition, with a similar argument to @Ca. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 00:18, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support original proposal. In my opinion, simply removing the colon will be more helpful to readers than trying to insert a lookalike character. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 14:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is why we shouldn't have made an alias for the template namespace. It created this makework, just as I predicted. Anyway, rename somehow. Fine with either Ca's proposal or ModernDayTrilobite's. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why not use the semicolon (;), as I suggested? JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 02:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because it looks less like to colon then the Unicode colon characters. If your plan is to get the title to render as close as possible to how it should then there's no reason for half measures. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 04:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the ratio symbol (∶) does resemble the colon more than the semicolon (;), but the latter is available on a standard computer keyboard unlike the former. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 04:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So what? Article titles aren't required to be available on a computer keyboard, especially since links to the correct and typeable title TM:103 Hustlerz Ambition still work through a redirect. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.