Talk:Sutorina

Montenegro Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montenegro, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montenegro on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontenegroWikipedia:WikiProject MontenegroTemplate:WikiProject MontenegroMontenegro articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bosnia and Herzegovina Low‑importance

	Bosnia and Herzegovina portal Sutorina is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bosnian territory claims

Stop the false editing. No government official from Bosnia and Herzegovina has ever said that Sutorina should be a part of the Bosnian territory! Do something useful instead, like, uploading some photos or stuff... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.94.101.49 (talk • contribs) 14 April 2010‎

Before my cleanup yesterday, the article appeared to be a big WP:COATRACK violation - it focused entirely on a fairly low-intensity territorial dispute, without providing sources. It still contains the bulk of that information, but without the most egregiously biased parts. It could still use some help, though. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 06:28, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The dispute content is now at Sutorina dispute. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 21:51, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If everything about the dispute is transferred from the Sutorina page to the dispute page then we can proceed on removing the "merge process" template on the page. Cheers. Hazbulator™ 22:35, 20 February 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hazbulator (talk • contribs)

I suggest moving Sutorina dispute to Sutorina, instead of having two articles.--Zoupan 00:09, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The location is a gazetteer item and as such it deserves an article according to WP:5, it's not inherently notable just because of the dispute. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 11:25, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]