Talk:Supreme (character)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Rewrite
[edit]Well, I just did a pretty major rewrite of the article; I think it's in a far better shape now, if only because it was a real mess before. However, I'm not actually familiar with the pre-Moore version of Supreme, so I went by what there was before and what I could dig up from the net; I'd very much appreciate it if someone who's actually read through these issues would go through that stuff and make sure it's accurate. (Not that, uh, the original material is likely to be terribly consistent. Or readable, what with this being a Liefeld book...) Likewise, I'm not familiar with what has been done with the character since Moore stopped working on it, so I'd love to see someone who's been keeping up with Supreme do some catch-up work there. Feedback would not be unwelcome. -- Captain Disdain 22:38, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Teamsupreme.jpg
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Teamsupreme.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:17, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Suprema.jpg
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Suprema.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 10:54, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Erik Larsen is using the unpublished Alan Moore scripts per Rob Liefeld
[edit]Announced at New York Comic Con 2011 http://www.bleedingcool.com/2011/10/14/black-swan-screenwriter-to-relaunch-youngblood-alan-moores-supreme-to-be-concluded-in-extreme-relaunch/ --8.22.136.8 (talk) 20:16, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Supreme Sacrifice
[edit]The section starts out in past tense (which is fine, because it's dated 2006). The rest of it is future tense. Was the series published, and does the article acurately portray the events? Argento Surfer (talk) 15:14, 2 February 2012 (UTC)