This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I propose that SNIA Technical Work Groups be merged into Storage Networking Industry Association. I think that the technical work groups can easily be explained in the context of of the SNIA, and the Storage Networking Industry Association article is of a reasonable size that the merging of SNIA Technical Work Groups will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Furthermore, merging will help alleviate the notability problem on the SNIA Technical Work Groups page. – voidxor(talk | contrib)01:32, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@W Nowicki: Would you like me to do the same for your proposed merge at SNIA Security TWG as well? I had seen that page but didn't want to nominate it until my proposed merger was settled. I strongly agree that it should be merged too. – voidxor23:14, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, that would be a great step. Another one is SNIA Conformance Testing Program which just has one link to its self-published page. It seems there should be some mentions in the trade press or something one could add to beef this article up, perhaps making it more historical narrative instead of a simple definition. The group has been around long enough, so does have staying power. Thanks for any help. W Nowicki (talk) 20:24, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]