Talk:Stick It

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gymnastics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gymnastics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gymnastics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GymnasticsWikipedia:WikiProject GymnasticsTemplate:WikiProject GymnasticsGymnastics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Stick it.jpg

Image:Stick it.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:37, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gymnastics Wikiproject

I have proposed a gymnastics wikiproject. If you are interested, please check it out. Help is needed.

Wikiproject Gymnastics Thanx Maddie was here 23:57, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scoring Controversy

The film (well, certainly the latter part) makes reference to a controversy surrounding the way points are deducted against all manner of trivial offences. Looking through some of the other real-life gymnastics articles, I haven't seen any references to this controversy. Is this a controversy that was invented for the film, or is it a real issue? If the latter, and it is included in another article, would it be possible to include a link to it? StephenBuxton (talk) 16:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The senseless deductions used to exist. I do know they had a major re-vamp of the scoring system within the last five years. I'm not sure if they were removed at that time or not - I admit I'm not as "up" on the sport as I used to be. I do know they have re-tooled the scoring system, as now the perfect "10" is literally impossible.SkittlzAnKomboz (talk) 01:56, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I could've sworn this article used to have a commentary on the whole situation and whoever removed it is a worthless fuckbag.

I looked at the previous versions, and recommend a revert back at least a year. Dec 2009 is easier to read. No mention of above edit, but the article looks more NPV and looks like a review. Seems someone's been sandboxing the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.174.83.232 (talk) 15:58, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There was a real protest by gymnasts that led to a change in the rules. The title of the movie "Sticking it" refers to "sticking the landing" (finishing a routine in a rigidly "ideal" pose without absorbing the impact of landing with legs requiring the bones, and spine to absorb it all.) That, and other compulsory moves was protested as so harmful to the gymnast's bodies they couldn't do it beyond a certain age. Usually under 12. Their bodies were so badly damaged by then. Feminists had been protesting the sport for ageism, as well as the tight costumes impugning perverse, and obscene sexual motives to it. Gymnasts distanced their movement from feminist protests as feminists hadn't been taking the health of the gymnasts into consideration at all. Sticking the landing, as well as some other moves deemed damaging, was removed as a compulsory move. The sport reporting then saw older gymnasts competing. I don't know the current status of sticking the landing is as a compulsory move. There was some left wing/right wing controversey about the protests with the right taking the position that the sport was voluntary, and the participants should follow the rules of the authorities regardles of the harm, and possible perverse or obscene sexual motives. The left left taking the position that the injustice of the situation was so clear that even 12 year old girls took corporate, and radical action. Both sides decrying the protests with the right saying young girls shouldn't protest, and the left saying they shouldn't have to. 98.164.74.140 (talk) 11:57, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]