Talk:Spandeck Engineering v Defence Science and Technology Agency
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Overestimated" seems to have been used when "underestimated" was intended
[edit]In the "Facts" section I read (I added the [square backets] for emphasis):
- Spandeck had [overestimated] the costs required for the project and subsequent payments to sub-contractors, which went over-budget, were not certified by DSTA.
Should this sentence actually read:
- Spandeck had [underestimated] the costs required for the project and subsequent payments to sub-contractors, which went over-budget, were not certified by DSTA.
That is, Spandeck's estimate of the costs was too low (an underestimate), the actual costs were higher than expected, and consequently the project went over-budget.
Dieter.Meinertzhagen (talk) 03:12, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- I changed "overestimated" to " underestimated".
- Dieter.Meinertzhagen (talk) 20:13, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Spandeck Engineering v Defence Science and Technology Agency page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Spandeck Engineering v Defence Science and Technology Agency" page.