Talk:Soviet destroyer Statny (1939)

Soviet destroyer Statny (1939) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 15, 2019. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Maritime / Russian & Soviet / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	World War II task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Soviet Union: Military Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Soviet destroyer Statny (1939)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 00:56, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to this in the morning. Parsecboy (talk) 00:56, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not much to nitpick:

Might be worth clarifying who Stalin was
"The ships were slightly overweight" - makes one wonder what the designed displacement was (or perhaps just what the difference between intended and actual displacement was)
- 41 tons overweight, not enough to be worth specifying the exact amount, IMO. But the Project 7s were overweight to begin with and this just made it worse. There's a great photo in the article of a 7U at sea in calm water with not a lot of freeboard, but, annoyingly, the text of the article doesn't really discuss freeboard issues at all or even give a figure for metacentric height, just a decrease of 30% between the 7 and 7U.
  - Fair enough. Parsecboy (talk) 20:41, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"expending 111–130 mm" - this reads awkwardly - like they expended 111 to 130 shells - this is a case where I'd probably write out "one hundred and eleven"

Nice work as usual. Parsecboy (talk) 14:28, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- All done. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:38, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]