Talk:Shivalik-class frigate

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:49, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Ship displacement

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed discussion as the starter was identified as sock of Chanakyathegreat.

---

Ships displacement is described as http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Template:Infobox_ship_begin/doc

Ship displacement and Ship tonnage are not the same thing. Displacement is the mass of a ship in a particular condition, like when it's fully loaded for battle. It is generally used for military vessels. Tonnage is a measurement of the cargo capacity of a vessel and isn't exactly correlated with weight: a ship of a particular tonnage will have a different mass depending on whether it's full of grain or iron. Entries in either parameter need to specifically identify the units in which they are being measured, such as long tons, metric tons or tonnes (unacceptable in articles using American English, use metric tons) or gross register tons or whatever. If possible, use templates such as {{{amt}}} GT, {{{amt}}} NT and {{{amt}}} DWT.

The shivalik class displacement is http://www.stratpost.com/ins-shivalik-stealthy-force-multiplier

http://www.upi.com/Business_News/Security-Industry/2011/08/26/India-commissions-second-stealth-frigate/UPI-59271314354180/

6200 tons.Aheadearth (talk) 03:02, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Quacking like a duck again I see Chanakya. Don't worry, you will be blocked soon. While yes your above post is correct, (well sort of) you fail to understand that India measures its displacement in tonnes. Just one of many of the Great legacies left behind by the British Empire. Furthermore an article must be verifiable trough reliable sources, therefore I must bring to your attention that the citations you provided are merely opinion based news organisations and appear to mirror a previous revision of this Wikipedia article. That is a problem we have to be aware of.Talk^Woe90i 12:19, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ship Homeport

Can someone please add Visakhapatnam as the home port for the three P-17 class ships. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Versova (talk • contribs) 01:31, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Shivalik-class frigate/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague (talk · contribs) 03:02, 9 June 2013 (UTC) I am very excited about these sorts of articles. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 03:02, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Lead & infobox

There needs to be mention of the class' namesake within the body of the article. Already mentioned(?) in 2nd paragraph, last line.

I consider the body of the article to exclude the lead and info box. Sorry for the turbidity :)

 Done :)

Design and description

You will need to explain (wikilink) mentions of LAN and of chapati- and dosa-.  Done

General characteristics and propulsion

Fine here.

Electronics and sensors

Fine.

Armament

Instead of Western, you could simply say Israeli.
Hal Dhruv or Sea King? Are they interchangeable? Or do they vary by ship?  Done

Construction and service

Please wikilink the JMSDF.  Done
"...deployed in the South China Sea." In what capacity?  Done

Ships

The next two sections are fine.

Conclusion

Very nice article. It has been delightful both observing and participating in the expansion of the GA Indian Warship section. Once everything has been fixed, I will pass this article. Congratulations! QatarStarsLeague (talk) 02:08, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/shivalik-class-friga/

  Triggered by \bnaval-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 12:48, 3 April 2014 (UTC)