Talk:Sheryl Sandberg
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sheryl Sandberg article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This talk page has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Unethical human experimentation
[edit]It may be worth adding a bit to the controversies section on Facebook's controversial human experimentation, and how Sandberg has expressed regret. See for example, this article in the Washington post and this related article on whether or not this was unethical. That said, I don't think those two citations are sufficient, and I'm not clear on Sandberg's level of responsibility for this human experimentation, though she is Facebook's Chief Operating Officer. And it's certainly an open question as to how unethical it was; it'd get you kicked out of academia in a hurry, but is perhaps not considered unethical in the corporate world. In any case, it seems Facebook will continue this experimentation. --Yamla (talk) 14:30, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Definitely. For such a controversial personality, it is disturbing that Wikipedia dedicated more room for her alleged 'philanthropy' than to her crimes. She is personally responsible for adding obstacles to the Muller investigation on Russian interference in the US election ( https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/12/politics/sheryl-sandberg-facebook-russia-ads/index.html ), to unethical human experimentation ( https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jul/02/facebook-apologises-psychological-experiments-on-users ) that amounted to damage on a larger scale than that of Josef Menegele a century ago. ( https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/07/03/sheryl-sandberg-not-sorry-for-facebook-mood-manipulation-study/ ). I would like to see this article becoming more objective and source-oriented. Suscipedepre (talk) 01:12, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Please reverse vandalism
[edit]Please see COI disclosure above.
Delete vandalism:Here
Best wishes,BC1278 (talk) 18:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
- Any editor may remove instances of obvious vandalism or typographical errors, per #1 and #3 of WP:COIU. An edit request is not necessary in those cases. Spintendo 19:18, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Philanthropy
[edit]Don't remove it again, references added. [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by ToddGrande (talk • contribs) 09:14, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
References
2021 Quartz profile
[edit][1] (t · c) buidhe 06:51, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
"Philanthropist"
[edit]What's with the pushing that she's a philanthropist and author? Many other billionaires have done much more than she has but don't get this much emphasis. There's hardly anything about it in the article body. I'm not saying she isn't one, I'm saying it seems like this article has been touched by a PR team. toobigtokale (talk) 23:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Yes I received a text from you saying I was gonna get some money from Mr Mark Zuckerberg but it want let me respond is it a fraud
[edit]Is the money you said mark Zuckerberg was giving me a lie because it want let me respond back Iam sure it's a 2600:1004:B106:EEE8:0:B:C0E2:5E01 (talk) 20:26, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in People
- B-Class vital articles in People
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- B-Class Miami articles
- Mid-importance Miami articles
- WikiProject Miami articles
- B-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Mid-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- B-Class Google articles
- Low-importance Google articles
- WikiProject Google articles
- B-Class Women writers articles
- Low-importance Women writers articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- WikiProject Women writers articles
- B-Class WikiProject Women articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- B-Class Women in Business articles
- High-importance Women in Business articles
- WikiProject Women in Business articles
- B-Class Jewish Women articles
- Low-importance Jewish Women articles
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press
- Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions