Talk:Shaw Prize

Shaw Prize is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 5, 2009	Featured list candidate	Promoted

Awards Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Hong Kong Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (22)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (289)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,033)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,442) • Stub-Class articles (6,729)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (390) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,338)

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

historical prizes

can anyone find a list of the laureates from pre-2004? i couldn't find one with a few minutes of googling, but it would be nice to have Roadnottaken (talk) 16:53, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The awards are first presented in 2004, hence there are no laureates prior to 2004. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 21:18, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redundancy

Why do we list each year multiple times, once for each winner that year, with corresponding (identical) rationales repeated so often? This can be easily avoided using a rowspan. (The only downside is an apparent Mediawiki bug that inteferes with sorting, but the table is already sorted by year, and there seems no good reason to want sorting by name or country, for such small tables.) For an example of what I'm talking of, compare the "mathematical sciences" section here and here. Shreevatsa (talk) 20:15, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

During the FL process, it was suggested that the tables should be sortable. But I guess you are right, sorting seems less useful here. So, feel free to restore your version. Though please keep the article consistent. Either all the tables are sortable, or all of them have rowspans.—Chris!_c/t 20:44, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've made the change, out of some masochistic reason. :-) Note that this also lets the table make it clearer that two life sciences prizes were awarded in 2004. The only unfortunate(?) consequence is that while earlier the first two tables were displayed at reduced width (because of the images) and the third at full width, now all three are displayed at the same width. Of course, removing one of the images or slightly decreasing their height would restore the previous situation. While it's good to have images, the tables look prettier (I feel) without line breaks. :-) Shreevatsa (talk) 22:13, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Error?

Andrew Wiles works in Princeton but he's British, not American. Is there a reason for US instead of UK being there? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.175.50.70 (talk) 12:08, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not an error. All nationality on this page is based on the Shaw Prize Foundation website. This is done to avoid any pointless debate about nationalities.—Chris!_c/t 21:26, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that if debate has already occurred on the recipient's page, it would make more sense to go with that. Wouldn't it be possible to simply say that all debate on nationality should occur at the recipient's article, rather than to contradict the information present in his/her article? RobHar (talk) 13:59, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, all the Nobel prize lists use the nationality listed by the Nobel foundation, not the person's actual one. I am just following the same format. If a note is there to explain that all the nationality info comes from the prize foundation, then I think it is fine. Contradiction isn't really an issue, imo, since the determination of nationality sometimes is contradictory in itself.—Chris!_c/t 23:10, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure about Ruslan Medzhitov's nationality? Here is a link to Shaw Prize Foundation website: http://www.shawprize.org/en/shaw.php?tmp=3&twoid=65. There is nothing about Uzbekistan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.40.118.36 (talk) 02:38, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Shaw Prize. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081013160933/http://www.shawprize.org/en/shawprize/2004/announcement/release.html to http://www.shawprize.org/en/shawprize/2004/announcement/release.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:30, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Shaw Prize. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110610170933/http://www.shawprize.org/common/pdf/laureates/laureate_chart_2009_en.pdf to http://www.shawprize.org/common/pdf/laureates/laureate_chart_2009_en.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:54, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Shaw Prize. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:19, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Request

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Per: WP:DCOI.

Hi fellow Wikipedians,

I would like to ask a peer to review and edit the following content for the Shaw Prize article:

1. As of 2018, 12 of the Nobel laureates – Jules Hoffmann, Bruce Beutler, Saul Perlmutter, Adam Riess, Shinya Yamanka, Robert Lefkowitz and Brian Schmidt, Jeffrey C Hall, Michael Rosbash, Michael W Young, Kip S Thourne, Rainer Weiss – were previous laureates of the Shaw Prize.

2. Board of Adjudicators: Frank H Shu (Chairman), Kenneth Young, Reinhard Genzel, Randy W Schekman, Timothy Gowers (Reference: http://www.shawprize.org/en/shaw.php?tmp=1&twoid=3&threeid=97)

3. Selection Committees 2018-2019:

Astronomy – Reinhard Genzel (Chairman), Chryssa Kouveliotou, John A Peacock, Scott Tremaine, Ewine Van Dishoeck

Life Science and Medicine – Randy W Schekman (Chairman), Bonnie L Bassler, Hans Clevers, Carol Greider, Richard Lifton, Xiaodong Wang, Huda Zoghbi

Mathematical Sciences – Timothy Gowers (Chairman), Hélène Esnault, Felix Otto, Paul Seidel, Wendelin Werner

(Reference: http://www.shawprize.org/en/shaw.php?tmp=1&twoid=3&threeid=97&fourid=556#cc)

Pn0824 (talk) 06:24, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 15-JAN-2019

Unable to review

Unless there is an actual COI present, the editor in question is free to make these changes to the article. As the nature of the editor's conflict of interest has not been disclosed, it cannot be stated with any certainty that a COI exists. These disclosures should be made when the request is placed.

Regards, Spintendo 08:34, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Request

Hi fellow Wikipedians,

I am working with the Shaw Prize Secretariat as an Operations Manager and would like to ask a peer to review and edit the following content for the Shaw Prize article:

1. Under the "Background" - As of 2020, 52 prizes have been awarded to 88 individuals. ^[1]

2. Under the "Background" - 14 Nobel laureates—Jules Hoffmann, Bruce Beutler, Saul Perlmutter, Adam Riess, Shinya Yamanaka, Robert Lefkowitz , Brian Schmidt, Jeffrey C. Hall, Michael Rosbash, Michael W. Young, Kip Thorne, Rainer Weiss, P. James E. Peebles and Michel Mayor—were previous laureates of the Shaw Prize.

3. Under "Mathematical sciences" - for 2010, the country of Jean Bourgain should be USA instead of Belgium as he was affiliated with IAS Princeton at the time of award.

Pn0824 (talk) 04:00, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://www.shawprize.org/the-shaw-prize/quick-facts

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Bonnie Bassler.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:23, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.shawprize.org/the-shaw-prize/quick-facts

[1]