Talk:Self-licensing

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Discrimination

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Existence of a "license to sin" logical fallacy?

I believe that there is a logical fallacy whereby, when accused of performing an immoral action, the arguer claims that they deserve to commit the act because of their previous good deeds. Is this a thing? Should it have a page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:4A2B:1801:FDAB:42DA:F2BC:A4AB (talk) 21:59, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Effect could not be replicated

https://plus.google.com/101046916407340625977/posts/5xXwpVQcDTg

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Self-licensing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Wen-Bin_Chiou/publication/51498271_Ironic_Effects_of_Dietary_Supplementation_Illusory_Invulnerability_Created_by_Taking_Dietary_Supplements_Licenses_Health-Risk_Behaviors/links/02bfe5109d79451154000000.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:33, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

proposed merge

I agree with the proposed merger of these sections WotherspoonSmith (talk) 05:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed and done for Moral credential effect. Klbrain (talk) 17:55, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]