Talk:Schism in Christianity
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
photian schism
[edit]any idea why this schism with its own page is not on here? 76.84.186.230 (talk) 05:45, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- I have no idea what even are the inclusion criteria for all those movements... Veverve (talk) 06:36, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
Society of St Pius X
[edit]The SSPX should not be mentionned here. The often called schismatic act of 1988 could not constitute a schism as the disobedience it carried was collateral and not wished for. There is no schism without intention to create a separate church.
Furthermore, we know that significant reconciliation processes have incurred since 1988, most notably in 2006, 2015, 2016, which have shown that the SSPX fully recognize the Pope, and Francis's pastoral gesture towards the Society have shown it is part of Church, despite its blurred legal recognition. 2A04:CEC0:1226:4ABF:E8DF:1E7:76EB:4C55 (talk) 18:24, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/20 March 2019
- Accepted AfC submissions
- Start-Class Christianity articles
- Mid-importance Christianity articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- Start-Class history articles
- Mid-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles
- Start-Class Catholicism articles
- Mid-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles