Jump to content

Talk:Saving Private Ryan/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    I tagged a couple of things that were missing cites, but I have no doubt as to their accuracy or that they can be cited in due course.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
    Archiving the talk page so severely may have been appropriate, but I had to go through the article history to reassure myself that you weren't trying to hide anything.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    There's certainly room for screenshots from the movie.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Identified issues aren't sufficient to hold back from GA status. Please address them, of course. Jclemens (talk) 01:03, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]