Jump to content

Talk:SMS Hannover

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleSMS Hannover is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starSMS Hannover is part of the Battleships of Germany series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 29, 2010Good article nomineeListed
May 26, 2010WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
June 27, 2010Good topic candidatePromoted
August 25, 2011Good topic candidatePromoted
June 29, 2019Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 22, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the SMS Hannover and her four sister ships represented the last Deutschland class pre-dreadnought battleships?
Current status: Featured article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Hannover/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jackyd101 (talk) 16:36, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the Wikipedia:good article criteria, with suggestions for future development, mainly concerning additional details that would benefit the article. Although these are not required to achieve GA standard, they might help in future A-class or FAC review process and I strongly recommend that they are followed.

  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  • At several points in the article, noticeably in the lead the prose doesn't flow very well, with too many full stops breaking it up. Can you work on this to make it smoother?
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  • The ship's obsolescence is mentioned in the lead but not in the main body of the article. Can we have a sentance describing this?
  • "Admiral Mauve" is not introduced: can you describe who he was the first time he is mentioned?
  • It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
  • It is stable.
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
  • Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:

Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 16:36, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]