Talk:SAS (shoemakers)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Not an encyclopedia article.
[edit]This is an advert.. Recommend delete --86.131.93.168 09:24, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- You evidently can't tell the difference between an advertisement and an encyclopedia article. You have ZERO credibility, simpleton.
- The IP has a valid point. Don't misunderstand: I am a big fan of SAS as a manufacturer of high quality goods made in America. I want SAS represented in en:wp. That said, a corporation's article is not their wp webpage, and has to be handled carefully in order not to slip-slide away into a simple ad. And ALL points of view have to be welcomed on talkpages. Incivility such as name-calling is never acceptable. Express your dissenting view in a cogent argument (missing), politely, and then sign your posting (your sig is also missing). rags (talk) 16:39, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:SAS shoes logo.jpg
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:SAS shoes logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:48, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Siesta Valley Ranch walk
[edit]Even though the free walk held at SAS's Siesta Valley Ranch in Medina, Texas, just celebrated its 20th consecutive year/walk yesterday (October 10, 2009), I'm having trouble finding reliably sourced articles about the walk. In fact, the #1 hit for the walk is to my own website's calendar entry for the walk--ironic and sad at the same time. 20 years of walking and no one has written about it? Probably more a case of Internet sites not picking up/archiving older articles about it. This comment is to elevate this so others can try to locate good sources (not personal blogs, etc.) about the walk, its history, origins, goals, etc. The SASshoes.com website does have a page on Siesta Valley Ranch (at http://www.sasshoes.com/main/about_siesta_valley_ranch.php) but it doesn't even mention the walk--they've always seemed to let the walk pretty much promote itself, so this isn't entirely surprising, but it's certainly not helpful when trying to source the info about the walk properly. :) - Ageekgal (talk) 17:40, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- What is the ranch walk? How does it differ from the free factory tour, or is that the walk to which you refer? rags (talk) 18:03, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
untitled
[edit]This article does not mention anything about the factory that SAS Shoemakers has in Acuna, Mexico. Also, there is no mention that the outsoles of many SAS shoes are manufactured in China. The article deceptively purports that SAS Shoes are American made, however, that is just not the case.
GraceAnnGibson (talk) 13:34, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Two years, no refutation? I am interested to hear. Are these still largely made in U.S.? rags (talk) 16:47, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Move?
[edit]"SAS Shoemakers" seems redundant to me. Maybe "SAS (shoemakers)"? rags (talk) 16:51, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
- The official site gives San Antonio Shoemakers® as the company name. "SAS" and the SAS logo are registered trademarks, but not "SAS Shoemakers" or "SAS Shoes". No one seems to watch this page any more, and 4 out of 5 of the ref footnotes are link-rotted. I'm moving it. rags (talk) 17:12, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Is SAS closing? I received an email where I order several pair of shoes and the co. Processing my pmt looks like chinese. Have I been scsmmed?
[edit]Close out prices a scam? 173.218.33.154 (talk) 20:49, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
- Stub-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Stub-Class fashion articles
- Low-importance fashion articles
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class San Antonio task force articles
- Low-importance San Antonio task force articles
- San Antonio task force articles
- WikiProject United States articles