Talk:Rosera

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rosera article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

India: Bihar / Cities / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Bihar (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian cities (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in March 2012.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

temples

anyone can tell me about all temples in and near rosera... 27.107.100.35 (talk) 09:50, 31 October 2010 (UTC)chandan Kumar[reply]

How many persons presently residing outside Rosera but belongs to Rosera

Dear All, You all are cordially invited for this discussion.

Please make sure about your attendance, if you are residing out of Rosera.

We all Roseraites are doing well in our own life, but please make our Rosera Global...

With best regards for all Roseraites,

Chandan Kumar — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.68.12.30 (talk) 13:27, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]