Jump to content

Talk:Rosemary Edna Sinclair

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleRosemary Edna Sinclair has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 23, 2016Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 19, 2016.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that environmental and children's rights activist Rosemary Edna Sinclair was named Miss Australia 1960?
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 17, 2017.

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Rosemary Edna Sinclair/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 07:05, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Will review. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 07:05, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

General
  • Some close paraphrasing is possible [1]
    • I have addressed the issue. Some of the sentences are in quotes and others pertain to titles or names
  • No dablinks or external link issue.
Early life and education
  • 12 year old Hyphens
  • Done
Personal life
  • Valentine's Day 1970 Let's give the plain date.
  • Added "14 February"

Thanks for the changes. This can be promoted. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:15, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 June 2022

[edit]

Information describing Rosemary Edna Sinclair mistakenly includes information relating to a different Rosemary Sinclair, CEO of .au Domain Administration Limited (auDA).

The following lines are about Rosemary Sinclair (auDA), not the Rosemary Sinclair this page represents, and as such should be removed:

Intro heading 'She has held many key posts at Telecom Australia. In 2002, she was represented on the Broadband Advisory Group of Federal Government' 'She also works as the Managing Director of the Australian Telecommunications (ATUG).'

Career heading 'In 1980, Sinclair became Managing Director of Australian Telecommunications Users Group (ATUG), an NGO dedicated to protecting the rights of product users in Australia in the field of telecommunications'

Affiliations and memberships heading 'Some of the key executive posts Sinclair has held are in the Telecom Australia as; "National General Manager – Communications Industry Accounts; Director, Strategic Development at the ABC; and as Director, Education, New Media and Export at Scholastic Australia." In 2002, she was represented on the Federal Government's "Broadband Advisory Group". She is also a member of the Government's "Australian Communications Industry Forum (ACIF), the Australian Telework Advisory Committee (ATAC), Teleworking Task Force, the National ICT Industry Alliance" and the Working Group of the Broadband for Health Program.'

'Sinclair is a represented on the "International Telecommunications Working Group (INTUG) Executive Committee". She is the Vice Chairman of INTUG Asia-Pacific Region.'

Thank you Hayleywigg (talk) 02:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: This is a contentious edit, or this has already been discussed, so you'll need to discuss first with other editors. If there is an existing discussion on the talk page please contribute to that section. If there is no existing discussion you may explain why this edit should be made in this section, or start a new section on this talk page. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:16, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User:FlightTime FYI the above user appears to have spotted a massive flaw in the article in which the subject has been confused with another person of the same name. ITBF (talk) 14:29, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@ITBF: OK. and you point to me is ? - FlightTime (open channel) 18:17, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User:FlightTime you rejected their edit request. Did you actually read it? ITBF (talk) 12:52, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't "reject" their concerns (hence the "Not done for now"), I suggested that the editors who regularly watch this page have a look a fix it correctly if needed. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:38, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]