Talk:Romans in Persia

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Iran Mid‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

How about Persians in Rome?

The title of this article says a "brief period during the rule of trajan".

Well trajan i can say was a post-christian ruler of Rome who tried to compensate for the loss of "aggression" Rome suffered because of christianity introduced to the empire. That may explain a "brief period" during which Rome managed to subdue parthia and not the sassanid kingdom. All i can see here in wikipedia are authors who try to give rome a modernistic image , similar to that portrayed by mel gibson in the movie "passion of the christ".

And these guys simply made the article longer by ading the part about roman captives in persian... That is inconsistency , because the captives were from the Byzantium , which is essentially not "Rome". " — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kermanii (talk • contribs) 07:30, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What writes Kermanii is totally mistaken. Trajan was NOT a post-christian ruler of Rome: in 117AD cristians were a small minority in the catacombs of Rome, who were facing terrible persecutions. Christianity was just starting to grow in the souls of the Romans, when Trajan conquered western Persia and placed there a vassal king. Another mistake is when Kermanii forgets that the Eastern Roman empire only under Heraclius started to be "bizantine" (and was no more fully related to Rome). Kermanii should get well informed about the history of Rome before writing something full of historical "inconsistency"! BD — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.233.140.197 (talk) 15:13, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Roman Parthia"?!

"Roman Parthia"?! seriously? It there any "French Russia" article on Wikipedia for Napoleon invasion of Russia?! Aryzad (talk) 18:05, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Sushtar Bridge.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:48, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]