Talk:Robert Muldoon

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Robert Muldoon article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 7 days

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

New Zealand: Politics Top‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Conservatism

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Neutral point of view and unreliability of sources

This article contains multiple unsourced and dubious claims, or claims that are not verified by the sources cited.

There are examples of opinion pieces critical of Muldoon being cited as fact in this article, rather than being quoted as someone's opinion.

There are also multiple examples of non-neutral language in this article. Examples include describing Muldoon as "uncouth" or "abrasive" without an accompanying source or providing attribution to the sources of such opinions. Radiatia (talk) 15:03, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The claims that aren't cited at all should be removed. From what I can see the other statements of opinions are recorded as such. --LJ Holden 12:14, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]