Jump to content

Talk:Ri Yong-ho (general)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ri Yong Ho

[edit]

What is this in Hangul please ? Eregli bob (talk) 11:42, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ri may be dead after gun battle

[edit]

北韓總參謀長李英浩解職　傳軍方內部流血衝突20死 | ETtoday國際新聞 | ETtoday 新聞雲 http://www.ettoday.net/news/20120720/76818.htm#ixzz21Dm4EomJ

Ex-North Korean Military Chief Possibly Dead After Reported Gun Battle Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/north-korea-ro-yong-dead-battle-2012-7#ixzz21DmSyiUa

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ri Yong-ho. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:22, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ri Yong-ho. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:56, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Revised Romanization

[edit]

Based on my limited knowledge of Korean and the following Wikipedia page: http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Lee_(Korean_surname) I think that the "Revised Romanization" of the family name in the Infobox should be "Ri", not "I". See also: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/리#Proper_noun EinkomischerKauz (talk) 07:04, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Requested move 17 September 2018

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved, and the base name becomes a dab page between the two topics.  — Amakuru (talk) 20:11, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Ri Yong-ho → Ri Yong-ho (general) – No evidence either the subject or Ri Yong-ho (diplomat) is the primary topic. See Talk:Ri_Yong-ho_(diplomat)#Requested_move_29_June_2018 - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 01:07, 17 September 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 13:00, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. Coverage is about even. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:10, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support WP:NOPRIMARY, per nominator. Roughly equal in page views and amount of reliable source coverage. Ri Yong-ho should be a disambiguation page, and Ri Yong-ho (politician) should point there as {{R from incomplete disambiguation}} (as pointed out in the other discussion, both men are politicians). 59.149.124.29 (talk) 01:44, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Yes, coverage is about even, and so are page views, and so we're supposed to have a dab page per WP:TWODABS, but I'm of the opinion that users are better off with the current title than the proposed. Currently those searching for the general with "Ri Yong-ho" are taken directly to the article they are seeking. That's awesome for that half. Those searching for the diplomat are also taken to the general, but a hatnote link leaves them one click from their page. If we retitle per the proposal then nobody will be taken to the page they're seeking with "Ri Yong-ho", and everyone will be taken to the dab page where they are one click away. In short, the move makes no one better off, and about half worse off. That's counter-productive. I oppose per WP:IAR of WP:TWODABS guidance. --В²C ☎ 17:41, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • By the way, I'm assuming the move is proposed in order to create a two-entry dab page at the base name, though that was not specified in the proposal. Technically, what's being literally proposed is leaving the base name as a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to the general, which is just silly. --В²C ☎ 17:44, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Relisting comment I am not convinced that an oppose based on ignoring the WP:TWODABS guideline is very solid. Regardless there is no harm in giving people time to debate the merits of the situation and to either rebut or support the IAR concept. I am relisting chiefly because the nomination does not make it clear this is intended to create a disambiguation page, and several people who participated in this other RM have not commented here yet. Possibly because no notification was placed on Talk:Ri Yong-ho (diplomat). — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 13:08, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ri_Yong-ho_(general)&oldid=1205330057"