Talk:Revolverlution

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Revolverlution article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Image

I really can't get that image to work. If anyone could help me out that'd be great.

(unsigned comment by User:MrNordstrom 21:07, 3 September 2006).

Solved. Please remember to use the same letter case than in the file name. --user:Erri4a - Say what? 00:33, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Revolverlution.JPG

Image:Revolverlution.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago Sun-Times review

Transcription using Google News Advanced News Archive Search. Chicago Sun-Times (Vrabel, Jeff. August 4, 2002) review of Revolverlution (2002):

*** Public Enemy, "Revolverlution" (Slamjamz/Koch). "I don't give a damn if you bounce to this/I don't give a damn if you shake to this," booms Chuck D early in PE's eighth record, an impressive collection that finds the rap godfathers in fine incendiary voice, whether zeroing in on their usual sociopolitical targets or taking shots at the current glitzy wasteland of hip-hop.
Like 1993's "Greatest Misses," "Revolverlution" is weirdly structured--it's part new tracks, part live performances and part interactive experiment featuring tracks remixed by fans as part of a contest on the PE Web site, so the finished product feels a bit like a bootleg remix album.
But most important, the album proves that Chuck D and Flavor Flav's state-of-the-union rhymes are intact, and 25 minutes of new PE is worth much more than an hour- plus in Nellyville. For proof, check out the rap-metal missive "Son of a Bush," and "Get Your ---- Together," in which Chuck D angrily juxtaposes the shortcomings of party rap to the potential of music inspired by 9- 11, shouting down MCs who "guessin' where the party at/while downtown wondering where them bodies at."
— Jeff Vrabel

Dan56 (talk) 01:49, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]