Jump to content

Talk:Renuka Chowdhury

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Domestic Violence Act

[edit]

Recommend that SaveIndianFamily start a new Wiki on the Domestic Violence Act and write a proper critique there. Unbalancing the profile of Renuka Chodhary is a cheap shot. Again, the "Famous Quotes" are not relevant.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.254.104.78 (talkcontribs) 13:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

WP:NPOV & WP:BLP - do no harm

[edit]

The following has been removed for violating WP:NPOV & WP:BLP:

She is a known 'bad case' of extreme feminism.She was also seen defending pratibha patil in the 2007 presidential elections due to her being a woman.

Please be aware of the policy for writing biographies of living persons. Central to this policy is the term do no harm - "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid; it is not our job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives." This includes speculation about their motivations and/or actions. If any claims like the above are to be added to any BLP - they must be sourced and they must be worded in a conservative and neutral fashion. Failure to comply with this policy is a serious issue on wikipedia and can result in warnings and blocks (template warnings such as {{blp2}} are far from trivial)--Cailil talk 15:07, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed ICDS section as utterly unsourced. What is believed about a person cannot be added to wikipedia. Only what is sourced and uncontravertial - see WP:BLP--Cailil talk 13:45, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Too much sockpuppetry

[edit]

I see that someone has been using a lot of socks in order to insert personal opinion into the article. I've blocked some of them and semi protected the article fro a month's rest. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 14:47, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Encroached?

[edit]

Do wiki authors know the meaning of encroachment?

How come they claim she encroached government bunglow?

Wiki is for useless - jobless i*iots - that has been proved now! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.96.14.157 (talk) 07:51, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pathetic POV

[edit]

The article has only criticisms. It selectively quotes her, out of context, etc. Vilification is clearly the aim. I am putting a POV tag. --Sahodaran (talk) 01:15, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Parking text

[edit]

This text may not be suitable for the article unless sources can be found that verify the outcome of the case per WP:BLP

Spelling of name

[edit]

None of the six sources cited in the article spell the subjects name as list in the title:Chowdary. Instead, two sources list is as: Chowdhury, two others as: Choudhury, one as: Chaudhary, and one as: Choudhry. We may need to rename this aricle.--KeithbobTalk 21:15, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Biased, POV and inclined to criticism

[edit]

Article is full of criticism. And criticism mentioned seems nothing but daily news materials which might have sparked havoc for a short period of time. Someone hate this person must have added. I searched if any of info mentioned has significant impact on person political career. I am removing entire section. --25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  06:46, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:00, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]