Talk:Redoubt

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force

Text and/or other creative content from this version of National redoubt was copied or moved into Redoubt with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Undated comment

"always contain only obtuse (vice, acute) angles." What does the stuff in the parentheses mean?

Opening sentence clarification

The phrase "an enclosed defensive emplacement outside a larger fort" was unclear to me. At first I thought the word 'larger' was a typo, as the fort couldn't be larger than the wall surrounding it. But perhaps this means there is a 'main' fort, with various outlying redoubts.

Someone else should edit the page, as I don't know enough about the material. I could suggest lines like: "surrounding a fort" or "a short distance from a larger fort"

Other than that, I found the article clear and informative. Tim Coahran (talk) 17:59, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

redoubt vs revetment

What Hamilton attacked at Yorktown was closer to a revetment than a redoubt. If you have ever seen "The Last Revetment" as Hamilton called it, it is not very large. You could walk from one end to the other in just over a minute. A Redoubt is large and protects a central structure or fortification. A Revetment protects soldiers from explosives or artillery fire. That makes Hamilton's "Last Revetment" just what he termed it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Devildave (talk • contribs) 16:32, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

A look at sources shows no clear distinction between reduit and redoubt. They are synonymous. Srnec (talk) 21:48, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No they're not :) Redoubt is a type of fortification - this term means that the building has been built in a specific way (redoubt is prepared for defense in siege, has emplacements etc.). But if a fortification is a reduit, it's because of its role within the whole fort. Reduit is the central building of the fort, its last stand. Like donjon in a medieval castle. It may be a redoubt, a blockhause - it doesn't matter. It matter only that it's the central building, or, like the Germans say - Kernwerk. Bartex77 (talk) 15:57, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A redoubt is typically an outlying fortification. A reduit is a citadel. -- PBS (talk) 10:20, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone add in origin of word.

Does it come from Italian or Occitan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.159.63.108 (talk) 13:03, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Most definitly from French, like 80% of military terms in English — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:CB1C:817A:9700:96C:3DEB:5ED:4077 (talk) 07:32, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Redoubt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150531015138/http://www.eh4-marenostrum.net/virtualtour/Marsaxlokk/trail_2/09/Vendome-Tower.pdf to http://www.eh4-marenostrum.net/virtualtour/Marsaxlokk/trail_2/09/Vendome-Tower.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:34, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]