Talk:Raw to the Bone
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 3 July 2024. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
![]() | The Raw to the Bone article was blanked and that title now redirects to Raw to the Bone. The contents of the former article are available in the redirect's history; for the discussion at that location, see the redirect's talk page. |
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by Cocobb8 (talk · contribs) on 7 February 2024. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Rawwb.jpg
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Rawwb.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:31, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Idiots writing wiki
[edit]Which idiot decided they could write articles ?
Read the intro for the article (first para for you slow ones) and then read the first para here Twin Barrels Burning
Someone sort it out please - its a bit ridiculous isn't it !?!