Talk:Rats!

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 21 February 2017 by reviewer SwisterTwister (talk · contribs).

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Sales/stats

If anyone can find any stats with sales figures etc or stuff on its reception, please do feel free to add it. I would appreciate any help I can get with this article. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 16:58, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IGN not an RS?

I know this is years late, but I just noticed it and had to ask. Izno why is IGN an unreliable source? RSP considers it generally reliable for reviews and pop culture/entertainment coverage. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 15:29, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IGN had a caveat at some point somewhere (I can't find it on WP:VGRS but that's where I remember it) that its early reviews (prior to 2005ish) were not as reliable as today. Aside from that, it was commented out and probably went along for that reason. Izno (talk) 16:26, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Izno: Oh, interesting. I went back to VGRS at the start of 2017 and bounced around from 2015-present and couldn't locate it. The IGN article was updated in 2018 to remove the rating, interestingly enough...2017 called it 3.0 stars. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 16:37, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]