Talk:Rationalism (international relations)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 3 August 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Rationalism (international relations) to Rational choice (international relations). The result of the discussion was moved.

Examples?

Flipper,

This looks like it's been essentially your solo project, and as another person interested in patching up Wikipedia's deplorable IR content, I applaud you for your efforts. However, as a student of international relations myself, I'm unaware of any academics who refer to themselves as "rationalists." If there are a bunch of which I'm not aware, I think it would strengthen the article to include some names, articles, or other references that back up that this is a school of international relations thinking.

Jordanp (talk) 07:57, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I'll have a look around. But as far as I can see, on the internet at least, there is precious little information on this theory. I'll have a look through the 'further reading' section of my book; see if there's anything else there. Flipper24 (talk) 23:12, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Baylis

According to "The Globalisation of World Politics" 4th ed, p178 rationalism is a way of describing neo-realism, marxism and neo-liberalism in contrast to critical theories such as feminism as well as "constructivism" said to be a mid-point between rationalism/critical theories. If that is correct isn't this article completely wrong? 02:49, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

There are many different types of Rationalism - even within politics. The book that you are using was published in the United States by OUP, whereas the term 'Rationalism' in the context of this article is used only in Australia, as far as I know.

The book that I used for most of this article is an official VCE textbook. Flipper24 (talk) 03:36, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This paragraph moved here from the Rationalism page.

In political contexts, the term rationalism is used to define the political belief that is mid-way between realism and internationalism.^[1] It is used to describe the political belief that the world political order is not as chaotic as suggested by realists, but maintains a certain degree of order where nation-states do not violate others' sovereignty unless absolutely necessary. Whereas internationalism advocates a purely global and orderly approach to international affairs, and realism a purely individual and chaotic approach, rationalism appears to combine these two philosophies. ^{[citation needed]}

Gruauder (talk) 03:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "Rationalism Definition". Retrieved 2009-05-01.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Realism in international relations - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 19:01, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is this really rationalism?

I am really confused, because I was under the impression that rationalism was a umbrella term for theories that argue in a certain way (http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/492034/rationalism), and can be contrasted with constructivist theories who argue that you can't find one truth in studies of any form of human interaction, because the behaviour of states and people is influenced by their culture and experiences, and your view of their actions is influenced by your culture and experiences. Neorealism and neoliberalism are for instance rationalist theories. (Apologies for the extremely bad explanation) Inkarnasjon (talk) 19:20, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 3 August 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. per discussion, this is indeed the more COMMONNAME. Not a robust consensus, but after 26 days, I think this is what we're gonna get. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 04:20, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rationalism (international relations) → Rational choice (international relations) – This is the more common term for this kind of scholarship in the field of International Relations. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 14:48, 3 August 2021 (UTC) — Relisting. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 16:33, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject International relations has been notified of this discussion. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 16:32, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Politics has been notified of this discussion. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 16:33, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

'Rational choice theory' is used in political theory and IR scholarship. That said both the current title and 'Rational choice theory (international relations)' are acceptable—blindlynx (talk) 17:35, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

If you if you and your offenders are both a Muslim and you practice Sharia law and practice sharila and you have not brought the offenders before the ummam

I was attacked by my fellow brothers Islam we are both Suni. And citizens of Karachi Pakistan. They ran away from the law here. I want Sharia to bring my offenders to me to seek justice. Allah States in the Quran that a woman raped by a Fellow brother shall be killed. I want to face them once and all for there crimes. IM MAKING HIJA SOON SO I WANT TO BE AT PEACE 98.186.194.1 (talk) 19:21, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "Rationalism Definition". Retrieved 2009-05-01.

[1]